Andrew Gierth wrote:
> >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Tom> Right, but we should be trying to move in that direction. I see
> Tom> your point though that (*) is more notationally consistent with
> Tom> that case. Maybe we should be looking at trying to implement T641
> Tom> in full and then including (*) as a special case of that.
>
> I would have liked to have done that, but that would have raised the
> complexity of the project from "Atri can take a stab at this one with
> negligible supervision" to "Andrew will have to spend more time than he
> has conveniently available staring at the raw parser to try and make it
> work".
Not to mention that, at this stage, we should be looking at reducing the
scope of patches in commitfest rather than enlarge it.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services