On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 09:37:08PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 02:18:58PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >> > [options="header",cols="<l,<l",frame="none"]
> >> > |====
> >> > |5 2.2+^.^ |4 2.2+^.^
> >> > |2 2.2+^.^ |3 2.2+^.^
> >> > |====
> >>
> >> Hm. This is still incorrect. You should remove options="header" here
> >> or the first tuple is treated as a header in the case
> >> non-expanded/tuple-only. Your patch removes correctly the header for
> >> the expanded/tuple-only case though.
> >> Regards,
> >
> > OK, fixed. Thanks for the testing. Patch attached. New output:
>
> This time things look good from my side. I have played with this patch
> some time, testing some crazy scenarios and I have not found problems.
> That's cool stuff, thanks!
Wow, thanks. I never would have gotten here without your help.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +