Re: POLA violation with \c service=
От
Alvaro Herrera
Тема
Re: POLA violation with \c service=
Дата
Msg-id
20150223205612.GC5169@alvh.no-ip.org
Ответ на
Re: POLA violation with \c service= (David Fetter)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
POLA violation with \c service= David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= David G Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= David G Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= "Erik Rijkers" <er@xs4all.nl>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: POLA violation with \c service= Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
David Fetter wrote: > My thinking behind this was that the patch is a bug fix and intended > to be back-patched, so I wanted to mess with as little infrastructure > as possible. A new version of libpq seems like a very big ask for > such a case. You'll recall that the original problem was that > > \c service=foo > > only worked accidentally for some pretty narrow use cases and broke > without much of a clue for the rest. It turned out that the general > problem was that options given to psql on the command line were not > even remotely equivalent to \c, even though they were documented to > be. So, in view of these arguments and those put forward by Pavel downthread, I think the attached is an acceptable patch for the master branch. It doesn't apply to back branches though; 9.4 and 9.3 have a conflict in tab-complete.c, 9.2 has additional conflicts in command.c, and 9.1 and 9.0 are problematic all over because they don't have src/common. Could you please submit patches adapted for each group of branches? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления