Re: Parallel Seq Scan

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephen Frost
Тема Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Дата
Msg-id 20150109213422.GJ3062@tamriel.snowman.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Parallel Seq Scan  (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>)
Ответы Re: Parallel Seq Scan  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
* Stefan Kaltenbrunner (stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc) wrote:
> On 01/09/2015 08:01 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Now, for debugging purposes, I could see such a parameter being
> > available but it should default to 'off/never-fail'.
>
> not sure what it really would be useful for - if I execute a query I
> would truely expect it to get answered - if it can be made faster if
> done in parallel thats nice but why would I want it to fail?

I was thinking for debugging only, though I'm not really sure why you'd
need it if you get a NOTICE when you don't end up with all the workers
you expect.
Thanks,
    Stephen

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE and RLS
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE and RLS