Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE and RLS

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Fetter
Тема Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE and RLS
Дата
Msg-id 20150108013343.GA14183@fetter.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE and RLS  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Ответы Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE and RLS  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 05:18:58PM -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 5:16 PM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> > There's precedent.  Unique constraints, for example.
> 
> I don't see that as any kind of precedent.

In the part you sliced off, Stephen described a situation where the
contents of a database either do or don't cause a query to violate a
constraint.  Uniqueness constraints are one example of this.

CREATE TABLE foo(id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY);

INSERT INTO foo(id) VALUES(1); /* Works the first time */
INSERT INTO foo(id) VALUES(1); /* Fails the next time */

Same database, same constraints, different outcome.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE and RLS
Следующее
От: Ali Akbar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [REVIEW] Re: Fix xpath() to return namespace definitions