Re: pg_basebackup -x/X doesn't play well with archive_mode & wal_keep_segments

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: pg_basebackup -x/X doesn't play well with archive_mode & wal_keep_segments
Дата
Msg-id 20150103150336.GA15316@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_basebackup -x/X doesn't play well with archive_mode & wal_keep_segments  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: pg_basebackup -x/X doesn't play well with archive_mode & wal_keep_segments  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2014-12-31 16:32:19 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-12-05 16:18:02 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > > So I think we just need to make pg_basebackup create to .ready
> > > files.
> >
> > s/.ready/.done? If yes, +1.
>
> That unfortunately requires changes to both backend and pg_basebackup to
> support fetch and stream modes respectively.
>
> I've attached a preliminary patch for this. I'd appreciate feedback. I
> plan to commit it in a couple of days, after some more
> testing/rereading.

Attached are two updated patches that I am starting to backport
now. I've fixed a couple minor oversights. And tested the patches.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
 Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: recovery_min_apply_delay with a negative value
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: recovery_min_apply_delay with a negative value