Re: Some other odd buildfarm failures
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Some other odd buildfarm failures |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20141226162400.GC1645@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Some other odd buildfarm failures (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Some other odd buildfarm failures
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Still, I don't think this is a reasonable test design. We have > >> absolutely no idea what behaviors are being triggered in the other > >> tests, except that they are unrelated to what those tests think they > >> are testing. > > > I can of course move it to a separate parallel test, but I don't think > > that should be really necessary. > > I've not proven this rigorously, but it seems obvious in hindsight: > what's happening is that when the object_address test drops everything > with DROP CASCADE, other processes are sometimes just starting to execute > the event trigger when the DROP commits. When they go to look up the > trigger function, they don't find it, leading to "cache lookup failed for > function". Hm, maybe we can drop the event trigger explicitely first, then wait a little bit, then drop the remaining objects with DROP CASCADE? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: