* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> So my two cents is that when considering a qualified name, this patch
> should take levenshtein distance across the two components equally.
> There's no good reason to suppose that typos will attack one name
> component more (nor less) than the other.
Agreed (since it seems like folks are curious for the opinion's of
mostly bystanders).
+1 to the above for my part.
Thanks,
Stephen