Re: Tom Lane 2014-12-15 <21813.1418655100@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> This is totally silly. The timecnt couldn't be anywhere near INT_MAX (in
> fact, it is not allowed to exceed TZ_MAX_TIMES, which is currently just
> 1200). And there are bunches of other instances of similar code in PG;
> shall we put equally wishy-washy comments on them all?
Well, if it's not interesting, let's just forget it. Sorry.
Christoph
--
cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/