Re: moving from contrib to bin
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: moving from contrib to bin |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20141212203700.GB1768@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: moving from contrib to bin (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: moving from contrib to bin
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Christoph Berg <cb@df7cb.de> writes: > > However, for PostgreSQL this means lengthy debian/*.install files > > (the equivalent of %files in rpm spec speak): > > Right ... > > > If there were separate "install-client", "install-server", and > > "install-contrib" targets, that would probably shorten those files > > quite a bit. Especially messy is the part where *.so needs to be > > sorted into server/contrib, along with an similar large bunch of > > binaries. > > Pardon me for not knowing much about Debian packages, but how would > that work exactly? Is it possible to do make install-client, then > package the installed files, then rm -rf the install tree, then > repeat for install-server and install-contrib? In the RPM world > this would never work because the build/install step happens in > toto before the packaging step. Uh, couldn't you just run "make install-client DESTDIR=.../client" for client-only files, and so on? You would end up with separate directories containing files for each subpackage. > Even without that, it seems like it'd be hard to make it entirely > automatic since some files would be installed in multiple cases (and > directories even more so). Yeah, you would need to fix that somehow. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: