Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 11/12/2014 06:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> How did template0 even get a MultiXact? That sounds like they're really abusing the template databases. :( (Do
keepin mind that MXID 1 is a special value.)
> > No, it's normal -- template0 does not have a multixact in any tuple's
> > xmax, but datminxid is set to the value that is current when it is
> > frozen.
>
> So, to follow up on this: it seems to me that we shouldn't be requiring
> freezing for databases where allowconn=false. This seems like a TODO to
> me, even possibly a backpatchable bug fix.
Why do we need this for pg_multixact but not for pg_clog?
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services