Re: [BUGS] ltree::text not immutable?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Christoph Berg
Тема Re: [BUGS] ltree::text not immutable?
Дата
Msg-id 20141117163838.GA5248@msg.df7cb.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [BUGS] ltree::text not immutable?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [BUGS] ltree::text not immutable?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Re: Tom Lane 2014-11-17 <6903.1416241481@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> Christoph Berg <cb@df7cb.de> writes:
> > In HEAD, there's this WARNING now:
> > WARNING:  type input function chkpass_in should not be volatile
> 
> Yeah, that's intentional.
> 
> > IMHO built-in functions (even if only in contrib) shouldn't be raising
> > warnings - the user can't do anything about the warnings anyway, so
> > they shouldn't get notified in the first place.
> 
> The point is to find out how many people care ...

Is the point of this to figure out whether to fix this properly, or to
revert to the old code? The current status isn't something that should
be released with 9.5.

> > (Catched by Debian's postgresql-common testsuite)
> 
> ... and by "people", I do not mean test suites.

Well atm this breaks the building of 9.5 packages. This means we are
not going to find out if anyone cares by this way :)

Christoph
-- 
cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Steve Singer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: logical decoding - reading a user catalog table
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: logical decoding - reading a user catalog table