Re: superuser() shortcuts

* Alvaro Herrera (alvherre@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> > As I started looking at this, there are multiple other places where
> > these types of error messages occur (opclasscmds.c, user.c,
> > postinit.c, miscinit.c are just a few), not just around the changes in
> > this patch.  If we change them in one place, wouldn't it be best to
> > change them in the rest?  If that is the case, I'm afraid that might
> > distract from the purpose of this patch.  Perhaps, if we want to
> > change them, then that should be submitted as a separate patch?
>
> Yeah.  I'm just saying that maybe this patch should adopt whatever
> wording we agree to, not that we need to change other places.  On the
> other hand, since so many other places have adopted the different
> wording, maybe there's a reason for it and if so, does anybody know what
> it is.  But I have to say that it does look inconsistent to me.

Updated patch attached.  Comments welcome.

    Thanks!

        Stephen