Re: Proposal for better support of time-varying timezone abbreviations

On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 09:50:16AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> The same thought had occurred to me.  Probably the main use of the
> datetime parsing code in ecpg is for interpreting outputs from the
> server, and (at least by default) the server doesn't use timezone
> abbreviations when printing timestamps.  So maybe that's largely
> dead code anyhow.  I would not propose back-patching such a change,
> but we could try it in 9.5 and see if anyone complains.

Agreed on all accounts.

> A less drastic remedy would be to remove just those abbreviations
> whose meaning has actually changed over time.  Eventually that
> might be all of them ... but in the meantime, we could at least
> argue that we weren't breaking any case that worked well before.

This is what your patch did, right?

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL