Hmm.. Sorry for my stupidity.
> Why is that necessary? It seems really rather wrong to make
> BIO_set_retry_write() dependant on ProcDiePending? Especially as, at
> least in my testing, it's not even required because the be_tls_write()
> can just check the error properly?
I mistook the previous conversation as it doesn't work as
expected. I confirmed that it works fine.
After all, it works as I expected. The parameter for
ProcessClientWriteInterrupt() looks somewhat uneasy but the patch
4 looks fine as a whole. Do you have anything to worry about in
the patch?
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center