Re: pg_upgrade, locale and encoding

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: pg_upgrade, locale and encoding
Дата
Msg-id 20141009204611.GA19877@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на pg_upgrade, locale and encoding  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct  7, 2014 at 03:52:24PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> While looking at bug #11431, I noticed that pg_upgrade still seems
> to think that encoding and locale are cluster-wide properties. We
> got per-database locale support in 8.4, and encoding has been
> per-database much longer than that.
> 
> pg_upgrade checks the encoding and locale of template0 in both
> clusters, and throws an error if they don't match. But it doesn't
> check the locale or encoding of postgres or template1 databases.
> That leads to problems if e.g. the postgres database was dropped and
> recreated with a different encoding or locale in the old cluster. We
> will merrily upgrade it, but strings in the database will be
> incorrectly encoded.

Wow, I never thought someone would do that, but they certainly could ---
good catch.

> I propose the attached patch, for git master. It's more complicated
> in back-branches, as they still support upgrading from pre-8.4
> clusters. We haven't heard any complaints from the field on this, so
> I don't think it's worth trying to back-patch this.

Agreed.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kevin Grittner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: bad estimation together with large work_mem generates terrible slow hash joins
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Autovacuum fails to keep visibility map up-to-date in mostly-insert-only-tables