On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 05:08:17PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-10-04 11:07:13 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 08:04:08PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 01:57:01AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > > On 2014-10-03 19:54:36 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > > > > > Agreeed. Also, reality check --- we can't change postgresql.conf easily
> > > > > > without an initdb, and I think our last 9.4 initdb is going to be
> > > > > > 9.4beta3, which is going to be packaged on Monday.
> > > > >
> > > > > Good point: independently of all else, it's a bit late to be adding new
> > > > > features to 9.4.
> > > >
> > > > This is getting absurd. The feature was there three days ago.
> > >
> > > My point is we have to have in there/decide by Monday or it isn't going
> > > to be in 9.4. I am unclear how we can resolve all the concerns about
> > > its addition in that short of a time.
> >
> > Actually, another issue is that we were only able to remove
> > xloginsert_locks this week because we are forcing an initdb for
> > 9.4beta3. If we had not, I am not sure how we would have removed this
> > undocumented setting, except to tell beta users to remove it from their
> > postgresql.conf file after we removed it from the server. This seems
> > sloppy --- we should have addressed this (documented it or removed it)
> > before beta1.
>
> It was marked as GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE.
Oh, that's interesting. Thank you.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +