Alvaro,
* Alvaro Herrera (alvherre@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> Thanks. One more tweak --- the whole reason for fiddling with this is
> to ensure that event triggers support this operation. Therefore this
> node should be handled by ProcessUtilitySlow, not
> standard_ProcessUtility, as in the attached patch.
[...]
> I propose this for 9.4 too.
Done.
> I bet they have! Have fun,
Thanks! I'm trying to. :)
Stephen