Re: [BUGS] BUG #10823: Better REINDEX syntax.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephen Frost
Тема Re: [BUGS] BUG #10823: Better REINDEX syntax.
Дата
Msg-id 20140908041750.GA16422@tamriel.snowman.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [BUGS] BUG #10823: Better REINDEX syntax.  (Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com>)
Ответы Re: [BUGS] BUG #10823: Better REINDEX syntax.  (Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
* Vik Fearing (vik.fearing@dalibo.com) wrote:
> On 09/02/2014 10:17 PM, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
> > Yeah, I think I like this better than allowing all of them without the
> > database name.
>
> Why?  It's just a noise word!

Eh, because it ends up reindexing system tables too, which is probably
not what new folks are expecting.  Also, it's not required when you say
'user tables', so it's similar to your user_tables v1 patch in that
regard.

> Yes, I will update the patch.

Still planning to do this..?

Marking this back to waiting-for-author.
Thanks!
    Stephen

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: proposal: ignore null fields in not relation type composite type based constructors
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: proposal: ignore null fields in not relation type composite type based constructors