Re: 60 core performance with 9.3

Matt Clarkson wrote:

> The LWLOCK_STATS below suggest that ProcArrayLock might be the main
> source of locking that's causing throughput to take a dive as the client
> count increases beyond the core count.

> Any thoughts or comments on these results are welcome!

Do these results change if you use Heikki's patch for CSN-based
snapshots?  See
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/539AD153.9000004@vmware.com for the
patch (but note that you need to apply on top of 89cf2d52030 in the
master branch -- maybe it applies to HEAD the 9.4 branch but I didn't
try).

--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services