Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Andres Freund
Тема
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts
Дата
Msg-id
20140720231214.GH5974@alap3.anarazel.de
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Stuart Bishop <stuart@stuartbishop.net>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
On 2014-07-20 19:04:30 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund  writes:
> > If any *single* full table vacuum after that calls
> > vac_update_datfrozenxid() which just needs its datfrozenxid advance by
> > one we're in trouble: vac_truncate_clog() will be called with minMulti =
> > GetOldestMultiXactId().
> 
> Uh, no, the cutoff is GetOldestMultiXactId minus
> vacuum_multixact_freeze_min_age (or the autovac equivalent).
> See vacuum_set_xid_limits.

Unfortunately not :(. The stuff computed in vacuum_set_xid_limits isn't
used for truncation - which normally is sane because another database
might be further behind.

void
vac_update_datfrozenxid(void)
{
...
	MultiXactId newMinMulti;
...
	/*
	 * Similarly, initialize the MultiXact "min" with the value that would be
	 * used on pg_class for new tables.  See AddNewRelationTuple().
	 */
	newMinMulti = GetOldestMultiXactId();
...
	while ((classTup = systable_getnext(scan)) != NULL)
	{
...
		if (MultiXactIdPrecedes(classForm->relminmxid, newMinMulti))
			newMinMulti = classForm->relminmxid;
	}
...
        if (dirty || ForceTransactionIdLimitUpdate())
		vac_truncate_clog(newFrozenXid, newMinMulti);
}

But even if it were, I don't really see how that changes anything?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- 
 Andres Freund	                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
FAQ