Re: BUG #10911: pg_upgrade appears to lose the transaction id epoch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: BUG #10911: pg_upgrade appears to lose the transaction id epoch
Дата
Msg-id 20140708224828.GA1697@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на BUG #10911: pg_upgrade appears to lose the transaction id epoch  (gregburek@heroku.com)
Ответы Re: BUG #10911: pg_upgrade appears to lose the transaction id epoch  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
Список pgsql-bugs
On Tue, Jul  8, 2014 at 09:17:05PM +0000, gregburek@heroku.com wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference:      10911
> Logged by:          Greg Burek
> Email address:      gregburek@heroku.com
> PostgreSQL version: 9.0.17
> Operating system:   Ubuntu Linux
> Description:
>
> When upgrading a 9.0.17 db to 9.3.4 via pg_upgrade, the transaction ids
> appear to fall backward in time:
>
> >From before the upgrade:
> => SELECT txid_snapshot_xmax(txid_current_snapshot());
>  txid_snapshot_xmax
> --------------------
>         66329538555
> (1 row)
>
> After the upgrade:
>
> => SELECT txid_snapshot_xmax(txid_current_snapshot());
>  txid_snapshot_xmax
> --------------------
>          1905029395
> (1 row)
>
> Looking at pg_control before the upgrade:
> $ pg_controldata /database/ | grep -i nextxid
> Latest checkpoint's NextXID:          15/1905728256
>
> After the upgrade:
> $ pg_controldata /database/ | grep -i nextxid
> Latest checkpoint's NextXID:          0/1905029398
>
>
> This is an unexpected loss of the higher order bits when the upgrade is
> performed. Is it possible to preserve the epoch across the upgrade?

Yes, this was reported in April 2014:

    http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJ2ymdgTEQ8AETJnQUeEuGjk-OGPWQn_MXgEY5urJpXbJNcohg@mail.gmail.com

I will try to fix it for 9.5, due in 2015.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: LEFT JOINs not optimized away when not needed
Следующее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #10911: pg_upgrade appears to lose the transaction id epoch