Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout

On 2014-06-23 13:33:46 +0200, Vik Fearing wrote:
> On 06/22/2014 07:47 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2014-06-22 09:27:24 -0700, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> >> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > but I don't like that much. Not sure what'd be good, the best I
> > currently can come up with is:
> > idle_in_transaction_termination_timeout =
> > idle_in_transaction_cancellation_timeout =
> 
> Except the transaction wouldn't be cancelled, it would be aborted.

That ship has sailed with pg_cancel_backend(), no?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services