Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:29:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > > I think this is caused because the variable is not defined as SOCKET.
> > > The attached patch fixes this. This should prevent the warning.
> >
> > Surely that's just going to move the errors somewhere else. The call
> > site still expects the argument to be int[].
>
> Ah, yes, you are right. This is a similar problem I had with libpq
> where PQsocket() had to return an int.
>
> Attached is an updated patch which follows my previous coding of
> checking for PGINVALID_SOCKET, and if not equal, assigns the value to an
> integer handle. I would also like to rename variable 's' to
> 'listen_sock', but that is not in the patch, for clarity reasons.
>
> Should this be held for 9.5? I think it is only warning removal. On
> the other hand, portability is what we do during beta testing.
I think this should go in 9.4, but as you say it's only warning removal
so there is probably little point in patching further back (this code
dates back to 9.3.)
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services