On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 05:46:49PM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Monday, January 27, 2014, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com<javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> > > On 26 January 2014 12:58, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com<javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> > >> On 2014-01-25 20:26:16 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > >>> Shouldn't this patch be in the January commitfest?
> > >>
> > >> I think we previously concluded that there wasn't much chance to get
> > >> this into 9.4 and there's significant work to be done on the patch
> > >> before new reviews are required, so not submitting it imo makes sense.
> > >
> > > I think we should make this a priority feature for 9.5
> >
> > +1. I can't think of many things we might do that would be more important.
> >
> Can anyone guess how likely this approach is to make it into 9.5?
> I've been pondering some incremental improvements over what we have
> now, but if this revolutionary approach has a high chance of landing
> then any work on incremental improvements would be pointless.
How much work do you anticipate for the description and PoC of
whatever it is you've been pondering?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate