Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)
Дата
Msg-id 20140506212020.GK30817@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May  6, 2014 at 04:18:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 08:50:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> >>> Where are we on the default JSONB opclass change?
> 
> >> Not sure.  I'm for changing it, I think, but it wasn't at all clear
> >> that we had consensus on that.  We did not have a proposed new name
> >> for the opclass either ...
> 
> > Where are we on this question?
> 
> Stuck on the naming question.  I'd be willing to do the patch legwork
> if we had a consensus (or even a proposal) for what to rename the
> current jsonb_ops to.

Well, then, we only have a few days to come up with a name.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pgindent run for 9.4
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pgindent run for 9.4