Re: possible dsm bug in dsm_attach()

On 2014-05-06 13:45:13 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > On 2014-05-06 08:48:57 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >> > The break because of refcnt == 1 doesn't generally seem to be a good
> >> > idea. Why are we bailing if there's *any* segment that's in the process
> >> > of being removed? I think the check should be there *after* the
> >> > dsm_control->item[i].handle == seg->handle check?
> >>
> >> You are correct.  Good catch.
> >
> > Fix attached.
> 
> Committed, thanks.

Heh. Not a fan of film references? :)

Thanks,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services