Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes
Дата
Msg-id 20140430195750.GA6018@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Greg Stark (stark@mit.edu) wrote:

> > I could do the legwork on either the GUC or moving hash indexes to an
> > extension if there's a consensus. But I suspect either will be quite
> > controversial...

> If you'd like to build an extension which provides hash indexes- I say
> go for it?  Nothing stopping you as far as that's concerned.

Extensions can't write/replay WAL, so it's not clear to me how would this
work.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Darren Duncan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: bgworker crashed or not?