Re: BUG #8842: lo_open/fastpath transaction inconsistency

On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 04:14:50PM +0000, Ludovic POLLET wrote:
> Reading the lo_xxx function documentation again, I found that the
> behavior could be related to the mode used when opening a lo.  It
> seems that opening a lo for write is not supposed to be transaction
> safe (see bellow). However, the jdbc driver we use does it - even for
> read access.
>
> I will follow the problem to the jdbc guys.

Thanks.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +