Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages?
| От | Stephen Frost |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20140417190007.GO2556@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages? (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages?
Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Merlin Moncure (mmoncure@gmail.com) wrote: > I doubt that's necessary though -- if the postgres caching algorithm > improves such that there is a better tendency for hot pages to stay in > s_b, Eventually the O/S will deschedule the page for something else > that needs it. In other words, otherwise preventable double > buffering is really a measurement of bad eviction policy because it > manifests in volatility of frequency accessed pages. I wonder if it would help to actually tell the OS to read in buffers that we're *evicting*... On the general notion that if the OS already has them buffered then it's almost a no-op, and if it doesn't and it's actually a 'hot' buffer that we're gonna need again shortly, the OS will have it. In other words, try to make the OS more like a secondary cache to ours by encouraging it to cache things we're evicting. Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: