Re: Another thought about search_path semantics
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Another thought about search_path semantics |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20140404204307.GA13431@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Another thought about search_path semantics (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Another thought about search_path semantics
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-04-04 14:56:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > I was actually suggesting that the only way to create something in > > pg_catalog is to do it with a explicit schema qualified id. I realize > > that that's not something backpatchable... > > I don't find that to be a good idea at all. pg_dump is probably not the > only code that believes it can select a creation target with search_path, > no matter what that target is. Sure, but how many of those are trying to put things in pg_catalog? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: