On 2014-03-28 16:41:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > On 2014-03-27 08:02:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Buildfarm member prairiedog thinks there's something unreliable about
> >> commit f01d1ae3a104019d6d68aeff85c4816a275130b3:
>
> > That's rather odd. It has survived for a couple of months on the other
> > buildfarm animals now... Could one of you apply the attached patch
> > adding more details to eventual failures?
>
> Any objection to separating out the have_mappings bit? It wasn't terribly
> appropriate before, but it seems really out of place in this formulation.
The patch I sent removed the have_mapping thing entirely? Do you mean it
should be there, but as a separate query?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services