On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 06:59:05PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 21 March 2014 18:26, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Given the minor symptoms in released versions, I lean against a back-patch.
> >
> > FWIW, I'd lean toward a back-patch. It's probably not a big deal
> > either way, but I have a hard time seeing what risk we're avoiding by
> > not back-patching, and it seems potentially confusing to leave
> > known-wrong logic floating around in older branches.
>
> Agreed. It could lead to some other bug by not fixing it.
Fair enough. I've back-patched it.
--
Noah Misch
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com