Re: pg_ctl status with nonexistent data directory
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_ctl status with nonexistent data directory |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20140305230838.GB20275@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_ctl status with nonexistent data directory (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_ctl status with nonexistent data directory
Re: pg_ctl status with nonexistent data directory |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:31:30AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> > This doesn't seem right:
> >
> > $ pg_ctl -D /nowhere status
> > pg_ctl: no server running
> >
> > It does exit with status 3, so it's not all that broken, but I think the
> > error message could be more accurate.
>
> I doubt anyone will object if you feel the urge to fix it. I won't, anyway.
I have addressed this issue with the attached patch:
$ pg_ctl -D /lkjasdf status
pg_ctl: directory "/lkjasdf" does not exist
$ pg_ctl -D / status
pg_ctl: directory "/" is not a database cluster directory
One odd question is that pg_ctl status has this comment for reporting
the exit code for non-running servers:
printf(_("%s: no server running\n"), progname);
/*
* The Linux Standard Base Core Specification 3.1 says this should return
* '3'
* https://refspecs.linuxbase.org/LSB_3.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/iniscrptact.html
*/
exit(3);
If they haven't passed us a data directory, we don't really know if the
server is running or not, so the patch just returns '1'.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: