Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
Дата
Msg-id 20140304014524.GE18320@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2014-03-03 20:32:13 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Afair (I really haven't rechecked) all the actions that have a changed
> > locklevels affect things that pg_dump recreates clientside, using a
> > repeatable read snapshot, so there shouldn't be much change there?
> 
> You're missing the point entirely if you think pg_dump recreates
> everything client-side. 

No, I am not obviously not thinking that. What I mean is that the things
that actually change their locking requirement in the proposed patch
primarily influence things that are reconstructed clientside by
pg_dump. E.g ALTER TABLE ... CLUSTER ON, SET(...), ...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Row-security on updatable s.b. views
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Securing "make check" (CVE-2014-0067)