Re: extension_control_path

* Dimitri Fontaine (dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr) wrote:
> I don't see any confusion about dynamic library name resolving added
> from the extension_control_path, I'm sorry. Simply because I don't
> expect people to use the facility without a third party software
> designed to fill-in the gap.
>
> You're saying that the backend should fill the gap, I'm saying that it
> should not. Or maybe within another patch entirely.

I find this role reversal to be quite bizarre.

Is this third-party software going to be modifying postgresql.conf too?
Thanks,
    Stephen