Re: notify duplicate elimination performance
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: notify duplicate elimination performance |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20140208180209.GB10692@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | notify duplicate elimination performance (Hardy Falk <hardy.falk@blue-cable.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: notify duplicate elimination performance
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2014-02-08 18:56:41 +0100, Hardy Falk wrote:
> I know that it is not a big problem for most users, but allowing a very
> large number of notifications while using linear search is a bit dumb.
> I can fix this with a very small modification to
> struct Notification:
> {
> char *channel ;
> char *payload ;
> uint32 hash ;
> struct Notification *left ;
> struct Notification *right ;
> }
> AsyncExistsPendingNotify does an iterative binary tree search.
> The tree is insert-only, there is no need for rebalancing, and the code
> is quite simple.
> Any comments?
Well, you didn't add any code, so it's hard to say... Simple ways of
doing what I think you describe will remove the queue's order. Do you
preserve the ordering guarantees?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: