Re: Why do we let autovacuum give up?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: Why do we let autovacuum give up?
Дата
Msg-id 20140123235247.GL7182@awork2.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Why do we let autovacuum give up?  (Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>)
Ответы Re: Why do we let autovacuum give up?  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2014-01-24 12:49:57 +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> autovacuum_max_workers = 4
> autovacuum_naptime = 10s
> autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor = 0.1
> autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor = 0.1
> autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay = 0ms
> 
> Stops excessive bloat - clearly autovacuum *is* able to vacuum pg_attribute
> in this case. Back to drawing board for a test case.

Well, I think quite many people don't realize it might be necessary to
tune autovac on busy workloads. As it very well might be the case in
Josh's case.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Mark Kirkwood
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why do we let autovacuum give up?
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why do we let autovacuum give up?