Re: proposal: hide application_name from other users

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: proposal: hide application_name from other users
Дата
Msg-id 20140122000131.GG29396@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: proposal: hide application_name from other users  (Harold Giménez <harold@heroku.com>)
Ответы Re: proposal: hide application_name from other users  (Harold Giménez <harold@heroku.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 03:57:37PM -0800, Harold Giménez wrote:
> > It also means that monitoring tools must run as superuser to see
> > information they require, which to me is a total showstopper.
> 
> 
> Well, the fact is that if you don't run monitoring tools as superuser,
> there may not be enough connection slots available anyways, in cases
> where actual usage is consuming all of max_connections, and only the
> reserved slots are available. So in a way it's already unreliable to
> run monitoring as non-superuser unfortunately.

You might need to run as superuser in these cases, but it is hard to see
why would need to do that in the normal case.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hard limit on WAL space used (because PANIC sucks)
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET typos and fix for temporary file name management