> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
>> Here is the patch to implement to_regclass, to_regproc, to_regoper,
>> and to_regtype.
>
> + static Datum regclass_guts(char *class_name_or_oid, bool raiseError);
>
> Minor bikeshedding, a lot of code currently uses an argument named
> "missing_ok" for this purpose (with inverse meaning of course). Any
> reasons why you chose "raiseError" instead?
Originally the proposal checks errors like syntactical one in addition
to missing objects. So I think "raiseError" was more appropriate at
that time. Now they only check missing objects. So renaming to
"missing_ok" could be more appropriate.
> I only had a brief look at the patch, so maybe I'm missing something.
> But I don't think you should create 3 variants of these functions:
> * parseTypeString calls parseTypeString_guts with false
> * parseTypeStringMissingOk calls parseTypeString_guts with true
> * parseTypeString_guts
>
> And this is just silly:
>
> if (raiseError)
> parseTypeString(typ_name_or_oid, &result, &typmod);
> else
> parseTypeStringMissingOk(typ_name_or_oid, &result, &typmod);
>
> Just add an argument to parseTypeString and patch all the callers.
Leave the disccusion to Yugo..
>> if requested object is not found,
>> returns InvalidOid, rather than raises an error.
>
> I thought the consensus was that returning NULL is better than
> InvalidOid? From an earlier message:
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Another advantage of this approach is that, IIUC, type input functions
>> can't return a NULL value. So 'pg_klass'::regclass could return 0,
>> but not NULL. On the other hand, toregclass('pg_klass') *could*
>> return NULL, which seems conceptually cleaner.
Not sure. There's already at least one counter example:
pg_my_temp_schema() oid OID of session's temporary schema, or 0 if none
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp