On 2014-01-13 10:56:00 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Well, it was the lack of sysctl options which takes the 2Q change from
> "annoyance" to "potential disaster". We can't ever get away from the
> possibility that the Postgres use-case might be the minority use-case,
> and we might have to use non-default options. It's when those options
> aren't present *at all* that we're stuck.
Unless I am missing something the kernel's going further *away* from a
simple 2q system, not the contrary.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services