Uh, was this ever addressed? I don't think so.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:18:57AM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 21 May 2013 19:16, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > We cannot run parallel pg_dump on the standby server because
> > pg_export_snapshot() always fails on the standby. Is this the oversight
> > of parallel pg_dump or pg_export_snapshot()?
> >
> > pg_export_snapshot() fails in the standby because it always assigns
> > new XID and which is not allowed in the standby. Do we really need
> > to assign new XID even in the standby for the exportable snapshot?
>
> Having looked at the code, I say No, we don't *need* to.
>
> There are various parts of the code that deal with
> takenDuringRecovery, so much of this was clearly intended to work in
> recovery.
>
> We use the topXid for the name of the snapshot file. That is clearly
> unnecessary and we should be using the virtualxid instead like we do
> elsewhere. We also use the topXid to test whether it is still running,
> though again, we could equally use the virtualxid instead. There is no
> problem with virtualxids possibly not being active anymore, since if
> we didn't have an xid before and don't have one now, and the xmin is
> the same, the snapshot is still valid.
>
> I think we should treat this as a bug and fix it in 9.3 while we're
> still in beta. Why? Because once we begin using the topXid as the
> filename we can't then change later to using the vxid.
>
> --
> Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +