Re: "stuck spinlock"
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: "stuck spinlock" |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20131227075119.GA17584@alap2.anarazel.de обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: "stuck spinlock" (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-12-12 20:45:17 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Memo to hackers: I think the SIGSTOP stuff is rather obsolete now that > most systems dump core files with process IDs embedded in the names. > What would be more useful today is an option to send SIGABRT, or some > other signal that would force core dumps. Thoughts? Although I didn't know of the option, I thought having it would be useful before. It allows you to inspect the memory of the individual backends while they are still alive - which allows gdb to call functions. Which surely is helpful when debugging some issues. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: