Re: "stuck spinlock"
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: "stuck spinlock" |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20131213153724.GM29402@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: "stuck spinlock" (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-12-13 10:30:48 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > On 2013-12-13 09:52:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> I think you're probably right: > >> what should be in the interrupt handler is something like > >> "if (ImmediateInterruptOK) CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS();" > > > Yea, that sounds right. Or just don't set process interrupts there, it > > doesn't seem to be required for correctness? > > It is if we need to break out of a wait-for-lock ... Right, that uses MyProc->sem and not MyProc->procLatch... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: