Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20131122215253.GH17400@alap2.anarazel.de обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-11-22 13:34:18 -0800, Kevin Grittner wrote: > Oddly, it didn't complain about creating users within a read-only > transaction. That seems like a potential bug. There's lots of things that escape XactReadOnly. I've thought (and I think suggested) before that we should put in another layer of defense by also putting a check in AssignTransactionId(). Imo the compatibility woes (like not being able to run SELECT txid_current();) are well worth the nearly ironclad guarantee that we're not writing. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: