Re: Suggestion: Issue warning when calling SET TRANSACTION outside transaction block

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Suggestion: Issue warning when calling SET TRANSACTION outside transaction block
Дата
Msg-id 20131122181955.GB32176@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Suggestion: Issue warning when calling SET TRANSACTION outside transaction block  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: Suggestion: Issue warning when calling SET TRANSACTION outside transaction block  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:17:41PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Good points.  I have modified the attached patch to do as you suggested.

Also, I have read through the thread and summarized the positions of the
posters:
                         9.3     WARNING                 ERROR SET                     none    Tom, DavidJ, AndresF
Robert,Kevin SAVEPOINT               error                           Tom, DavidJ, Robert, AndresF, Kevin LOCK, DECLARE
        error                           Tom, DavidJ, Robert, AndresF, Kevin
 

Everyone seems to agree that SAVEPOINT, LOCK, and DECLARE should remain
as errors.  Everyone also seems to agree that BEGIN and COMMIT should
remain warnings, and ABORT should be changed from notice to warning.

Our only disagreement seems to be how to handle the SET commands, which
used to report nothing.  Would anyone else like to correct or express an
opinion?  Given the current vote count and backward-compatibility,
warning seems to be the direction we are heading.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Gierth
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs
Следующее
От: Rajeev rastogi
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: COPY table FROM STDIN doesn't show count tag