On 2013-11-19 09:51:28 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 11/19/2013 06:20 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2013-11-18 23:15:59 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> Afaics it's likely a combination/interaction of bugs and fixes between:
> >> * the initial HS code
> >> * 5a031a5556ff83b8a9646892715d7fef415b83c3
> >> * f44eedc3f0f347a856eea8590730769125964597
> >
> > Yes, the combination of those is guilty.
> >
> > Man, this is (to a good part my) bad.
> >
> >> But that'd mean nobody noticed it during 9.3's beta...
>
> Ah, so this affected 9.3.0 as well?
Yes.
> Maybe it's worth it now to devise some automated replication testing?
It'd be a good idea, but I am not sure where to get resources for it
from.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services