Re: pg_xlog size growing untill it fills the partition

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michal TOMA
Тема Re: pg_xlog size growing untill it fills the partition
Дата
Msg-id 201310040754.12226.mt@sicoop.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_xlog size growing untill it fills the partition  (Ken Brush <kbrush@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
I have it set to 0 already.

On Friday 04 October 2013 00:16:28 Ken Brush wrote:
> Try setting the following in your postgresql.conf:
>
> wal_keep_segments = 0
>
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Michal TOMA <mt@sicoop.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a problem on my pg 9.2.4 setup (OpenSuse 12.2, kernel 3.2.13).
> > My pg_xlog directory is growing uncontrolably untill it fills the
> > partition. The database is under heavy write load and is spread on two
> > tablesapces one on a ssd software raid1 partition and a second one on a
> > hdd software raid1 partition.
> > I have no wal archiving enabled nor any replication.
> >
> > I have tried different checkpoint related parameters without any
> > noticable improvement.
> > Now I have:
> >         checkpoint_completion_target = 0.9
> >         wal_buffers = 8MB
> >         checkpoint_segments = 16
> >         checkpoint_timeout = 20min
> >         shared_buffers = 2GB
> >         log_checkpoints = on
> >
> > This is what I can see in the log:
> > 2013-10-03 13:58:56 CEST   LOG:  checkpoint starting: xlog
> > 2013-10-03 13:59:56 CEST   LOG:  checkpoint complete: wrote 448 buffers
> > (0.2%); 0 transaction log file(s) added, 9 removed, 18 recycled;
> > write=39.144 s, sync=21.136 s, total=60.286 s; sync files=380,
> > longest=14.517 s, average=0.055 s
> > 2013-10-03 14:04:07 CEST   LOG:  checkpoint starting: xlog
> > 2013-10-03 15:27:01 CEST   LOG:  checkpoint complete: wrote 693 buffers
> > (0.3%); 0 transaction log file(s) added, 0 removed, 16 recycled;
> > write=90.775 s, sync=4883.295 s, total=4974.074 s; sync files=531,
> > longest=152.855 s, average=9.196 s
> > 2013-10-03 15:27:01 CEST   LOG:  checkpoint starting: xlog time
> > 2013-10-03 19:06:30 CEST   LOG:  checkpoint complete: wrote 3467 buffers
> > (1.3%); 0 transaction log file(s) added, 0 removed, 16 recycled;
> > write=122.555 s, sync=13046.077 s, total=13168.637 s; sync files=650,
> > longest=234.697 s, average=20.069 s
> > 2013-10-03 19:06:30 CEST   LOG:  checkpoint starting: xlog time
> > 2013-10-03 22:30:25 CEST   LOG:  checkpoint complete: wrote 10198 buffers
> > (3.9%); 0 transaction log file(s) added, 216 removed, 33 recycled;
> > write=132.229 s, sync=12102.311 s, total=12234.608 s; sync files=667,
> > longest=181.374 s, average=18.144 s
> > 2013-10-03 22:30:25 CEST   LOG:  checkpoint starting: xlog time
> >
> > I ran pg_test_fsync on the hard disk when postgresql is down and I have
> > the following results:
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >------------------------------------ O_DIRECT supported on this platform
> > for open_datasync and open_sync.
> >
> > Compare file sync methods using one 8kB write:
> > (in wal_sync_method preference order, except fdatasync
> > is Linux's default)
> >         open_datasync                      59.639 ops/sec
> >         fdatasync                          43.959 ops/sec
> >         fsync                              34.497 ops/sec
> >         fsync_writethrough                            n/a
> >         open_sync                          35.612 ops/sec
> >
> > Compare file sync methods using two 8kB writes:
> > (in wal_sync_method preference order, except fdatasync
> > is Linux's default)
> >         open_datasync                      24.199 ops/sec
> >         fdatasync                          38.680 ops/sec
> >         fsync                              35.412 ops/sec
> >         fsync_writethrough                            n/a
> >         open_sync                          13.337 ops/sec
> >
> > Compare open_sync with different write sizes:
> > (This is designed to compare the cost of writing 16kB
> > in different write open_sync sizes.)
> >          1 * 16kB open_sync write           5.499 ops/sec
> >          2 *  8kB open_sync writes         21.412 ops/sec
> >          4 *  4kB open_sync writes         13.065 ops/sec
> >          8 *  2kB open_sync writes          6.720 ops/sec
> >         16 *  1kB open_sync writes          3.320 ops/sec
> >
> > Test if fsync on non-write file descriptor is honored:
> > (If the times are similar, fsync() can sync data written
> > on a different descriptor.)
> >         write, fsync, close                36.353 ops/sec
> >         write, close, fsync                37.347 ops/sec
> >
> > Non-Sync'ed 8kB writes:
> >         write                           500365.249 ops/sec
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >------------------------------------
> >
> > When the server is up and running under the usual load I get the
> > following results:
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >------------------------------------ 2 seconds per test
> > O_DIRECT supported on this platform for open_datasync and open_sync.
> >
> > Compare file sync methods using one 8kB write:
> > (in wal_sync_method preference order, except fdatasync
> > is Linux's default)
> >         open_datasync                       0.369 ops/sec
> >         fdatasync                           0.575 ops/sec
> >         fsync                               0.125 ops/sec
> >         fsync_writethrough                            n/a
> >         open_sync                           0.222 ops/sec
> >
> > Compare file sync methods using two 8kB writes:
> > (in wal_sync_method preference order, except fdatasync
> > is Linux's default)
> >         open_datasync                       0.383 ops/sec
> >         fdatasync                           2.171 ops/sec
> >         fsync                               1.318 ops/sec
> >         fsync_writethrough                            n/a
> >         open_sync                           0.929 ops/sec
> >
> > Compare open_sync with different write sizes:
> > (This is designed to compare the cost of writing 16kB
> > in different write open_sync sizes.)
> >          1 * 16kB open_sync write           0.079 ops/sec
> >          2 *  8kB open_sync writes          0.041 ops/sec
> >          4 *  4kB open_sync writes          0.194 ops/sec
> >          8 *  2kB open_sync writes          0.013 ops/sec
> >         16 *  1kB open_sync writes          0.005 ops/sec
> >
> > Test if fsync on non-write file descriptor is honored:
> > (If the times are similar, fsync() can sync data written
> > on a different descriptor.)
> >         write, fsync, close                 0.098 ops/sec
> >         write, close, fsync                 0.067 ops/sec
> >
> > Non-Sync'ed 8kB writes:
> >         write                               0.102 ops/sec
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >------------------------------------
> >
> > I need to tell to the server to limit the amount of wal files in pg_xlog
> > somehow whatever the efect on the performance could be.
> >
> > As for now I have to monitor the disk size and manually restart the
> > server. It takes a few seconds to process all the wal files and resume.
> > I have to do this a few times a day as it takes about 10 hours to get
> > 20GB of wal files in the pg_xlog directory (what fills my partion on the
> > ssd).
> >
> > Any help with this issue would be greatly appreciated as I don't see what
> > else I can try.
> >
> > Michal
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> > To make changes to your subscription:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general




В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jaime Casanova
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Comparing Oracle vs Postgres Fwd: [ADMIN] Database replication to 50-80 nodes
Следующее
От: Alban Hertroys
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_xlog size growing untill it fills the partition