Re: Timestamp with and without timezone conversion confusion.

On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:48:02AM +0000, Albe Laurenz wrote:

>> Or does that still need some C sprinkling (for operator support, say) ?
>
> Exactly. If you want "<" to work right for this data type
> that's the road you have to go.

I see.

Whatever became of the 2011 intent to implement
the above that's linked to in the blog post ?

Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346