* Merlin Moncure (mmoncure@gmail.com) wrote:
> Having matviews using SQL expressible features is a *good* thing.
Fine, then it should be implemented *using SQL*, which is based on
*values*, not on how the value is represented in bits and bytes.
> Having a user accessible operator is nice to have (if for no other
> reason than to allow testing for which matview rows would be
> refreshed).
If it's not actually *changing* (wrt its value), then I'm not at all
impressed with the notion that it's going to get updated anyway.
Thanks,
Stephen